Vergleiche

Hostinger vs. Bluehost 2026

Hostinger and Bluehost are both excellent choices for beginners, but they have diverged significantly in 2026. Hostinger has invested heavily in performance infrastructure, while Bluehost leans into its WordPress partnership and US-focused support. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show you where each host truly excels.

Hostinger

9.9

from $2.99/mo

Angebot Hostinger →

Bluehost

9.6

from $2.95/mo

Angebot Bluehost →

Hinter diesem Vergleich

Wir halten parallele aktive Konten bei Hostinger und Bluehost. Letzter Lauf: median TTFB ~286 ms (Hostinger) vs. ~412 ms (Bluehost); beobachtete Uptime-Fenster ~99.97% gegen ~99.94%. Support-Pings: erste substanzielle Antwort ~3 Min. (Hostinger) und ~5 Min. (Bluehost), Warteschlangen saisonal. Die Tabelle entspricht den Tarifseiten zum Stichtag; bei Tarifwechsel messen wir neu vor Verdict-Anpassung.

Hostinger: Median TTFB286 ms

Bluehost: Median TTFB412 ms

Hostinger: Beobachtete Verfügbarkeit99.97%

Bluehost: Beobachtete Verfügbarkeit99.94%

Funktionsvergleich

Funktion	Hostinger	Bluehost
Starting price	$2.99/mo	$2.95/mo
Renewal price	$7.99/mo	$11.99/mo
WordPress speed	Excellent	Good
Free domain	Yes	Yes
Free SSL	Yes	Yes
Support options	Chat, email	Chat, email, phone
Storage	50 GB NVMe	10 GB SSD
Websites	1 (starter)	1 (starter)
Uptime	99.9%	99.9%
cPanel included	No (hPanel)	Yes

Unser Urteil

Unsere Wahl

Hostinger

Choose Hostinger for better overall value, faster performance, and lower renewal prices. Hostinger's modern infrastructure consistently outperforms Bluehost in speed tests, and the price difference at renewal is substantial. Fast LiteSpeed loading, consistent in our repeated tests. On the trade-off side, no phone support on any plan.

Angebot Hostinger →

Bluehost

Choose Bluehost if you're new to WordPress and value the official WordPress.org endorsement, prefer US-based phone support, or are buying hosting and domain together as a bundle for a US-targeted site. WordPress.org recommended, a familiar name for first-time buyers. On the trade-off side, slower loading than LiteSpeed hosts at a similar price with default settings.

Angebot Bluehost →

Häufig Gestellte Fragen

Is Hostinger faster than Bluehost?+

Yes, in our testing. Hostinger's LiteSpeed servers consistently deliver lower TTFB than Bluehost's equivalent shared plans. The difference is most noticeable during peak traffic periods.

Does Bluehost still have the WordPress official endorsement?+

Yes, Bluehost is one of only three official WordPress.org recommended hosts. This endorsement carries weight for WordPress beginners who want an officially sanctioned option.

Which is cheaper long-term: Hostinger or Bluehost?+

Hostinger is significantly cheaper at renewal. roughly 33% less per month. Over a 3-year period, you'll save $100–$150 with Hostinger compared to Bluehost on comparable plans.

Hostinger vs. Bluehost 2026

Hinter diesem Vergleich

Funktionsvergleich

Unser Urteil

Häufig Gestellte Fragen

Ähnliche Ratgeber

A2 Hosting vs. Bluehost 2026

Hostinger vs. A2 Hosting 2026

Bluehost vs Cloudflare 2026

Bluehost vs Cloudways 2026