Contabo vs Vultr 2026

Contabo optimises sticker price; Vultr optimises geographic reach and API ergonomics. We treat Contabo as “profile before prod”; we treat Vultr as default DIY cloud for many teams.
Contabo
8.0
from $4.99/mo
Ver Oferta Contabo →
VS
Vultr
8.9
from $5.00/mo
Ver Oferta Vultr →

Por detrás desta comparação

Mantemos contas activas paralelas na Contabo e na Vultr. Última ronda: TTFB mediano ~318 ms na Contabo e ~278 ms na Vultr; uptime observado ~99.90% versus ~99.96%. Pings de suporte: primeira resposta útil ~60 min para Contabo e ~20 min para Vultr, com sazonalidade nas filas. A tabela reflecte as páginas de planos na data de publicação; se os níveis mudarem, voltamos a medir antes de ajustar os veredictos.

Contabo: TTFB mediano318 ms
Vultr: TTFB mediano278 ms
Contabo: Uptime observado99.90%
Vultr: Uptime observado99.96%

Comparativo de recursos

Recurso Contabo Vultr
Entry price ~$4.99/mo $5/mo
Region list Shorter Long
API maturity OK Strong
Support expectations Slow Faster
Disk perf variance Higher Lower
Bare metal Yes Yes
Best for prod APIs Risky Safer
Best for lab VMs Excellent Good
Snapshot UX Add-on Built-in
Community tutorials Niche Huge

Nosso veredito

Contabo
Choose Contabo when you need maximum RAM/disk headlines for internal tools and accept support latency. High RAM per euro for memory-heavy staging setups. On the trade-off side, basic, slow ticket support.
Ver Oferta Contabo →
Nossa escolha
Vultr
Choose Vultr when you need predictable network behaviour, more regions, and faster incident comms. Many locations, host services close to users for low-latency apps. On the trade-off side, lock down server images yourself. Stock images not enough for strict rules.
Ver Oferta Vultr →

Perguntas Frequentes

Why not Contabo for everything?+
Cost savings disappear if outages cost revenue. Match spend to SLA needs.

Guias Relacionados