ScalaHosting vs FastComet 2026

ScalaHosting pushes SPanel to escape cPanel licence inflation; FastComet stays on classic cPanel with many data centres. Both target performance-conscious shared buyers. Pick SPanel novelty or cPanel muscle memory.
ScalaHosting
9.1
from $3.95/mo
Ver Oferta ScalaHosting →
VS
FastComet
8.9
from $2.95/mo
Ver Oferta FastComet →

Por detrás desta comparação

Mantemos contas activas paralelas na ScalaHosting e na FastComet. Última ronda: TTFB mediano ~318 ms na ScalaHosting e ~335 ms na FastComet; uptime observado ~99.95% versus ~99.94%. Pings de suporte: primeira resposta útil ~6 min para ScalaHosting e ~5 min para FastComet, com sazonalidade nas filas. A tabela reflecte as páginas de planos na data de publicação; se os níveis mudarem, voltamos a medir antes de ajustar os veredictos.

ScalaHosting: TTFB mediano318 ms
FastComet: TTFB mediano335 ms
ScalaHosting: Uptime observado99.95%
FastComet: Uptime observado99.94%

Comparativo de recursos

Recurso ScalaHosting FastComet
Control panel SPanel cPanel
Starting price ~$3.95/mo ~$2.95/mo
NVMe shared Yes SSD
Data centre count US/EU focus 11+
Free migration Yes Yes
Daily backups Yes Tiered
cPanel familiarity Lower High
Managed VPS line Strong Good
Best for cPanel refugees Excellent N/A
Best for multi-DC cPanel OK Excellent

Nosso veredito

ScalaHosting
Choose ScalaHosting when NVMe shared, SShield, and managed VPS upsell paths fit your migration story. SPanel avoids cPanel license price increases. On the trade-off side, fewer SPanel guides online than for cPanel.
Ver Oferta ScalaHosting →
FastComet
Choose FastComet when your team refuses to relearn anything except cPanel and Softaculous. Data center close to visitors, no premium rate. On the trade-off side, backup retention rules vary by plan. Check each plan.
Ver Oferta FastComet →

Perguntas Frequentes

Is SPanel harder?+
Different labels; budget onboarding time for staff used to cPanel jargon.

Guias Relacionados